REVEALED: The F1 loophole that meant Norris AVOIDED penalty

McLaren's Lando Norris adopted a cheeky (if intentional) (which it wasn't) tactic to gain an advantage over his rivals at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

The Brit was plagued by McLaren's lack of speed during the race, which condemned him to an eighth placed finish around the tight street circuit.

READ MORE: Pit-stop disasters and Hamilton gesture - 5 things you may have missed at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

But the race could have potentially been worse for him, had he have been penalised for an incident right at the start of the grand prix.

The 24-year-old looked to get the jump on his rivals by starting the race just a split second before the lights went out in Jeddah, something that would normally trigger a slam-dunk penalty.

Norris appeared to look a little guilty when asked about it by Sky Sports after the race, but confirmed that, if anything, he lost out from the incident.

"I just went a little bit and then tried stopping again, and then went again. But overall, I lost. I didn't gain anything from it,” he said.

FIA sensors miss Norris infringement

So, how did the McLaren driver get away with his apparent jump start? Well, it appears that the sensors in place to detect such a misdemeanour were not working. On top of this, a bizarre 'loophole' means that if McLaren were hit with a penalty for the incident, they could have got it scratched off immediately.

Sky Sports F1 pundit Anthony Davidson explained the incident after the race: “There will probably be lots of questions regarding this potential jump start from Lando Norris," he said.

"It was something that we all saw and something that he definitely felt.

“The lights are on, the car clearly moves, he stops and then he gets going again. So why didn’t he get a penalty?

“Well, on the circuit, on each grid box there is a sensor. Now it appears that the sensor wasn’t working. It didn’t detect the car moving. It’s an automated system and it didn’t detect that the car had moved.

“So, the stewards, although they can see that it is a potential jump start, or was a jump start, the human eye can detect it, the sensor didn’t actually pick it up. So that’s the first bit of luck.

“Second, there’s a bit of a loophole in the regulation. If they were given a penalty, it turns out that if the team appealed it, they would win the appeal because the sensor can’t detect the car moving," the former F1 driver revealed.

“So that’s why, Lando Norris, we believe didn’t get a penalty for this actual jump start. Computer said no.”

The FIA then seemed to back this theory up with a statement, suggesting that the incident was looked at by the stewards, but that the sensors had not been triggered.

"The stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video and determined that the video appeared to show that car four moved before the start signal was given," the stewards said after the race.

"However, the FIA approved and supplied transponder fitted on the car did not indicate a jump start.

"Article 48.1 a) of the Formula One Sporting Regulations states clearly that the judgment of whether or not there was a jump start is to be made in accordance with the transponder, which did not show a jump start. In the circumstances, we took no further action.”

READ MORE: Ferrari LEGEND sent Bearman message ahead of F1 debut

Related

Red Bull

Red Bull demand FIA INVESTIGATION into rival team

• November 8, 2024 20:00

McLaren

McLaren confirm driver leaving to join RIVALS in 2025

• November 8, 2024 16:00